Longrangefractaldynamicinvisualsearchampbeyond长距离的视觉搜索和分形动力学超越课件.pptx
- 【下载声明】
1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
3. 本页资料《Longrangefractaldynamicinvisualsearchampbeyond长距离的视觉搜索和分形动力学超越课件.pptx》由用户(ziliao2023)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Longrangefractaldynamicinvisualsearchampbeyond 长距离 视觉 搜索 动力学 超越 课件
- 资源描述:
-
1、 Ralf Plag-Schtzenstrasse Karlsruhe-Germanyhttp:/www.fractal-dome.de/e2dg1.shtmlScale-free-Rethinking what we study&measurePower laws!BehaviorBehavior#Typical scale=Central tendencyNewman,M.(2005).Power laws,Pareto distributions and Zipfs laws.Physics Letters,2.Deterministic rules?Simple set of neur
2、onal interaction rules(e.g.,SOC,Volterra.)?Long-range dynamic?Memory?Are there correlations across sequence of fixations?What guides eye-movements during visual search?Find:What does visual search teach us?Perceptual processes!Efficiency&Accuracy Mechanisms Automatic vs.Voluntary Distributed vs.Focu
3、sed Attention Inattention,Pre-&Post-attention Early vs.late vision Search strategy Parallel,Serial,random or?Look for the red item+LLLLLLLLLLLL300400500#of itemsRT(msec)510150 ms/itemFeature searchFast(300ms)Parallel(0-10ms/item)Distributed attentionEarly visionFeatures.Find the odd itemDiscriminate
4、 by.Color xxxxxxx Size xxxxxxx Orientation -l-Movement xxxx-Depthx Conjunction SearchFbination of features 2 orientations(particular arrangement)Find:L among Ts TTTLTTTTTTTTLTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTL300500700#of itemsRT(msec)5101540 ms/item0 ms/itemFeatureConjunctionConjunction searchSlowerSequentialFocuse
5、d attention neededLate visionThe change in RT and/or accuracy with set size is a measure of the efficiency of search.In highly efficient searches,attention is deployed directly to the target location and,thus,the number of distractors does not influence RT.In inefficient search through items that ca
6、n be identified without fixation,each additional distractor typically adds 20-40 ms to the time required to find a present target and 40-80 ms to the time required to determine that a target is not present(Wolfe,1998).More recent visual search theoryDepth effects on visual search 1989-1997 shading t
7、exture gradientisoluminant gradientsaerial perspectiveheight-in-planeMy contribution to our understanding of early vision&the feature/conjunction distinctionARVO 95What guides search?Environmental informationLotsInternal cognitive processAttention.MemoryNeuronal interactions-Deterministic ProcessSel
8、f-Organized Criticality(SOC)?Horowitz,T.S.&Wolfe,J.M.(1998).Visual Search has no memory.Nature,357,575-577.Finding:Random repositioning of stimuli does not affect search RTs No memory?Do we keep track of where we look?Is there memory in search?Memory in visual search?Memory for locations in search(K
9、ristjansso,2000)Identity of objects accumulates over time(Treisman&Gelade,1980)Implicit memory(lots of context effects)Olivia&Wolfe,2004)Random repositioning of stimuli does not affect search RTs(Horowitz&Wolfe,1998)Inattentional amnesia in search(Wolfe,1999)(Wolfe,2003;Wolfe et al.,2000,2002)descri
10、bed repeated search tasks in which familiarity with a search display produced little or no improvement in search efficiencyEvidence forEvidence against We are able to keep track of where we look!Inhibition of return(Klein,1982)Failure to replicate inhibition of return(Wolfe&Pokorny,1990)Horowitz,T.S
11、.&Wolfe,J.M.(1998).Visual Search has no memory.Nature,357,575-577.Key Press RTs vs.Eye MovementsFinding:Random repositioning of stimuli does not affect search RTs Non-systematic eye-movementsEngle,1977;Ellis&Stark,1988;Scinto&Pillalamarri,1986;Krendel&Wodinsky,1960;Groner&Groner,1982Aks,D.J.Zelinsky
12、 G.&Sprott J.C.(2002).Memory Across Eye-Movements:1/f Dynamic in Visual Search.Nonlinear Dynamics,Psychology and Life Sciences,6(1),1-15.Gregory Zelinsky SUNY-StonybrookJulien C.Sprott UW-MadisonEye-movement studyCollaboratorsOverviewQUESTIONS.What guides complicated eye movements?Random or non-rand
13、om process?Is there memory across fixations?Might neural interactions drive search?METHOD OF TESTING.Challenging visual search taskKEY ANALYSES Heavy-tail distributions?Power law relation?Coloring of noise-Memory across eye-movements Fourier analysisVisual Search TaskTTTTTTTFind the upright“T”TTTTTT
14、TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTMethod.Each trial contained 81 Ts.400 trials lasting 2.5 hours.1 second central fixation Eight 20-minute sessions separated by 5-minute rest Generation V dual purkinje-image(DPI)tracker Map trajectory of eyes:Duration&x,y coordinates for each fixation.-Differences between fixat
15、ions xn xn+1&yn yn+1Distance=(x2+y2)1/2 Direction=Arctan(y/x).Analyses Probability Distributions Power spectra(FFT)Descriptive&Correlational Statistics Additional tests.Results 24 fixations per trial(on average)7.6 seconds(SD=6.9 sec)per trial(316 ms/item).Mean fixation duration=212 ms(SD=89 ms)10,2
16、15 fixations across complete search experiment.Conventional search statsFocusing on the dynamicWhats the central tendency?Series of Fixation Differences(yn+1-yn)Scatter plot of 10,215 eye fixations for the entire visual search experiment.Eye FixationsDelay Plot of Fixationsyn-vs-y n+1Across 8 sessio
17、ns we see scaling:Fixation frequency decreased from 1888 to 657Fixation duration increased from 206 to 217 ms.Changes in fixation position xn xn+1 decreased yn yn+1 increased No typical scale!Scaling from Context sensitivity-Scale-free processPower laws!Rethinking what we study&measureHeavy-tail dis
18、tributionsnPower-laws,Pareto&80/20 lawsnSmall events are common;large ones are rare!xn-vs-x n+1Heavy-tail distributionsnSmall events are common;large ones are rare!yn-vs-y n+1Network-DistributionBarabasi,A.&Bonabeau,E.(2003).Scale-Free Networks.Scientific American,288,60-69.http:/www.nd.edu/networks
19、/gallery.htmEdelman&Tononi,2000Spectral analysis Fast-Fourier Transform (FFT)Power vs.Frequency Regression slope=power exponentf a af-2=1/f 2Brown noiseNoisy time seriesWhitePinkBrownWhite NoisePink NoiseBrown Noise1/f 0 noise-flat spectrum=no correlation across data pointsShort&Long range=0 1/f noi
20、se-shallow slope=subtle long range correlation1/f 2 noise-steep slope=Predictable long-range,undulating correlation Short range=0(successive events uncorrelated)Power law indicates Fractal properties:Scale-free(means w/measuring resolution)Self-similar(statistically)Critical+flexible(1/f)Memory Stee
21、pness of the slope(on a log-log scale)reflects.Correlation across data points White-no memory Pink-subtle,long-range Brown-uncorrelated in shortest-range+Predictable long-rangePower Spectra on raw fixationsaPower Spectra of first differences across fixations a=-.6 Distance across eye fixations(x2+y2
22、)1/2a=-.47a=-0.3 a=-1.8Additional fractal measuresnAutocorrelationnRelative Dispersion(SD/M)nIterated Functions Systems(IFS)nRescaled range R/S(Hurst exponent)-running sum of deviations from mean/SD evaluate persistence&anti-persistenceIterated Function Systems-IFS Test-(Peak&Frame,1994;Stewart,1989
23、).Fixation Series1234Start123412341234123412341234PinkNoiseBrown NoiseWhite Noise1/f 1/f 1/f Brown(ish)noiseClustering along diagonals reveals short-term,highly correlated consecutive data pointsRaw FixationsFixation differences Pink(ish)noiseTriangular microstructure associated w/long-term,loosely
24、correlated consecutive data pointsClustering indicates correlated fixations.Direction of fixations show anti-correlated movements a indicated by absence of main diagonals.IFS Test:Fixation directionIFS tests yields patterns consistent w/FFT results Summary of results:Sequence of Absolute eye positio
展开阅读全文
链接地址:https://www.163wenku.com/p-7345046.html