书签 分享 收藏 举报 版权申诉 / 28
上传文档赚钱

类型《健康经济学》课件Chapter2.ppt

  • 上传人(卖家):momomo
  • 文档编号:5900314
  • 上传时间:2023-05-14
  • 格式:PPT
  • 页数:28
  • 大小:1.45MB
  • 【下载声明】
    1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
    2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
    3. 本页资料《《健康经济学》课件Chapter2.ppt》由用户(momomo)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
    4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
    5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
    配套讲稿:

    如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。

    特殊限制:

    部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。

    关 键  词:
    健康经济学 健康 经济学 课件 Chapter2
    资源描述:

    1、Standard economic demand curves are downward slopingAs price(P)decreases,quantity(Q)demanded increasesExample:P=$3,Q=4 lollipopsP=$1,Q=8 lollipopsP=$0.50,Q=9 lollipops Elasticity measures the degree of downward-sloping Elastic demand DE price sensitive:changes in price greatly affect the quantity de

    2、mandedInelastic demand DIPrice insensitive:changes in price do not significantly change the quantity demandedDoes the demand curve for health care slope downward?Are people sensitive to the price of health care?Is demand for vaccines such thatP=$100,Q=1,000P=$1,Q=1,000i.e.demand is inelastic?Is dema

    3、nd for band-aids such thatP=$100,Q=1P=$1,Q=30i.e.demand is elastic?If people always obey their doctors,then demand should be inelastic!Need randomized experiments Randomized experiments:Definition:a study that assigns treatments randomly to different groups of study participantsIncludes:A control gr

    4、oup(no treatment)Placebo groupHelps generate experimental groups that are statistically similar to each otherNon-randomized experiments can be biasedMeasured demand curve DM is biased compared to true demand DTPeople generally choose the amount of insurance they receiveSicker people will choose more

    5、 insurance because they know they will need more careEvidence from Randomized ExperimentsTwo Randomized ExperimentsRAND Health Insurance Experiment(HIE)Oregon Medicaid ExperimentRAND HIERandomly assigned 2,000 families from six US cities to different insurance coverage plansCopayments groups:Free,25

    6、%,50%,and 95%Tracked utilization of health care(Q)in each copayment plan(P)Copayment acts as the marginal cost that each family faces when buying careOregon Medicaid ExperimentCompared two groups of low-income adultsMedicaid lottery winners vs.lottery losersLottery winners got to apply for public he

    7、alth insurance through Medicaid So they faced lower out-of-pocket prices for careLottery losers could not get Medicaid(but might have purchased outside insurance)Results?Health care demand curves are downward sloping(economic theory prevails!)Price changes affected demand for health careDifferent me

    8、asures of careOutpatient CareDef:any medical care that does not involve an overnight hospital stayE.g.runny noses,twisted ankles,minor broken bonesInpatient CareDef:medical care requiring overnight staysE.g.More serious surgeries or conditions that require overnight recovery or monitoringER CareDef:

    9、care involving the emergency roomE.g.heart attacks,strokes Outpatient careRAND HIEAs patient cost-sharing(P)increases,number of episodes(Q)of outpatient care decreasesHolds for both acute and chronic conditionsData from Keeler et al.(1988)Outpatient careOregon Medicaid StudyLottery winners have more

    10、 outpatient visits than lottery losersBoth the RAND HIE and the Oregon Medicaid Study find downward-sloping demand for outpatient care!Inpatient careRAND HIE Oregon Medicaid StudyNo significant difference in usage rates between lottery winners and lottery losersDemand is still downward-sloping but l

    11、ess elastic than demand for outpatient care(Data from Keeler,1988)ER careRAND HIEOregon Medicaid StudyNo significant difference in ER care for lottery winners vs.lottery losersEven for emergency room care likely the most urgent kind those on the highest copayment plan in the RAND HIE were less likel

    12、y to buy care!(Data from Newhouse,1993)Pediatric carePediatric careDef:care for infants or children usually paid for by a parent or guardianData from RAND HIE:Mental health&dental Care(RAND HIE)Prescription drugsData from RAND HIENon-randomized experiment evidenceU.S.MedicareCitizens are eligible fo

    13、r health insurance through Medicare when they turn 65 but not beforeIf demand for health care is downward-sloping,we expect a jump in health care usage at age 65This is known as a discontinuity studyThere is a discontinuity in health insurance at age 65Card et al.(2009)Card et al.have two main findi

    14、ngs:Unplanned emergency department admissions follow a linear trend around the age of 65Other hospital admissions jump up at the age of 65There is a discontinuity in medical usage at the same point of discontinuity in Medicare coverage!This is further evidence that demand for health care is sensitiv

    15、e to priceComparing demand curves How can we determine which type of demand is more price sensitive?Data from Keeler et al.(1988)Arc Elasticity Need a measure to compare the relative price sensitivity of different goodsSo the measure needs to be unitless(how else would we compare ER visits to sticks

    16、 of gum?)Arc Elasticity:Health care has inelastic demandDoes price for care affect health?Mortality ratesRAND HIE:no difference between treatment groups*10%difference of mortality rate between high-risk participants on free and cost-sharing plans(people on free plan less likely to die)Oregon Medicai

    17、d:no difference between lottery winners and losersDoes the price of care affect health?Does price for care affect health?RAND HIE:Generally,no health differences between people on free plan vs.cost-sharing!*Only statistically significant difference between plans were in blood pressure,myopia,&presby

    18、opiaDoes price for care affect health?Oregon Medicaid ExperimentLottery winners self-reported better overall health,more healthy days,and lower rates of depressionDiscrepancy with RAND HIE may be because Oregon Medicaid Study worked with the very low-income,while RAND HIE studied a broader cross-sec

    19、tion of the U.S.ConclusionDemand curves for health care are downward slopingQuantity of care demanded is sensitive to price(though not as sensitive as other demands,e.g.for movies)BUT generally,price of health care does not seem to affect ones healthException is that price seems to affect the most vulnerable segments of the population(low-income,high blood pressure,etc.)Policy and health insurance implications?

    展开阅读全文
    提示  163文库所有资源均是用户自行上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作他用。
    关于本文
    本文标题:《健康经济学》课件Chapter2.ppt
    链接地址:https://www.163wenku.com/p-5900314.html

    Copyright@ 2017-2037 Www.163WenKu.Com  网站版权所有  |  资源地图   
    IPC备案号:蜀ICP备2021032737号  | 川公网安备 51099002000191号


    侵权投诉QQ:3464097650  资料上传QQ:3464097650
       


    【声明】本站为“文档C2C交易模式”,即用户上传的文档直接卖给(下载)用户,本站只是网络空间服务平台,本站所有原创文档下载所得归上传人所有,如您发现上传作品侵犯了您的版权,请立刻联系我们并提供证据,我们将在3个工作日内予以改正。

    163文库