Unit3IsTradeGoodforAmerica参考模板范本.doc
- 【下载声明】
1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
3. 本页资料《Unit3IsTradeGoodforAmerica参考模板范本.doc》由用户(林田)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Unit3IsTradeGoodforAmerica 参考 模板 范本
- 资源描述:
-
1、Unit 3 Is Trade Good for America?Teaching Objectives and Requirements: (教学目标与基本要求)1. Let the students master some basic terms of international trade;2. Let the students know some information about the novel: “The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism” from which the text is taken; 3. Let t
2、he students remember and use new words and expressions4. Explain language points in Text A and Supplementary reading “Excessive Collaboration” taken from The Economists. Focus: (教学重点)Let the students know the basic knowledge of free trade and trade protectionismDifficulties: (教学难点)1. Term Study: fre
3、e trade; trade protectionism; comparative advantage; opportunity cost;2. Information about “The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism”; 3. Comprehension of the key sentences of text A “Is Free Trade Good for America”?Teaching Procedures and teaching Time: (教学进程与学时分配)Teaching time:200 minut
4、es (4 periods) Part I Pre-reading Questions: (Multi-media, 10 minutes.) It can be used as lead-in questions. For students, they can discuss with each other and will have free answers. (1) Should you feel guilty about purchasing foreign products? (2) Do you believe “Buy Chinese” is the path to nation
5、al prosperity? (3) Is free trade good for us and our country, or bad? Give your reasons. Part II Extensive Reading In this part, there are Text A and a supplementary reading taken from The Economists. By reading the texts in limited time, teacher helps students understand the contents and the readin
6、g methods to build reading abilities gradually. Text A: Is Trade Good for America? (140 minutes) a. Let the students read Text A as quickly as they can for the first time to get the general idea (10 minutes) b. Ask students to tell others the general idea of the text (10 minutes) c. Use some basic r
7、eading skills to read through the text again to find the answers to the following questions (20 minutes) 1. Under what circumstances will the statement “If the Japan had stayed poor, America would have become even richer” be true? 2. Why couldnt the Olympic metaphor be applied to world trade?3. How
8、did Japanese get wealthier than Americans between 1960 and the beginning of the 1990s? Was it because they lost World War II and could start from scratch with all the newest technologies? 4. In Dave s opinion, what was the secret of Japanese success between 1960 and the beginning of the 1990s? 5.Wha
9、t does the example of “Honda and Sony” tell us? 6. What does “resource” refer to ? How can we use resources in a wise way? 7. What does the author try to tell us by giving the example of “corn”? 8. According to Dave, under what circumstances will farmers plant corns by themselves? 9. What would be t
10、he results of Americas import of Japanese television? 10. Whats Daves purpose of comparing Americans losing jobs after the import of Japanese televisions with doctors losing jobs after the disappearance of all diseases? d. Check the answers to the questions (30 minutes)1. Under what circumstances wi
11、ll the statement “If the Japan had stayed poor, America would have become even richer” be true? A: (L8) Only if there was a fixed amount of wealth in the world and the nations of the world tussled over it. 2. Why couldnt the Olympic metaphor be applied to world trade?A: Because world trade can be wi
12、n-win while the Olympic Games are win-lose. Evidence: (L9)The Olympic metaphor is misleading. If Japan wins the gold medal in television production, America has somehow lost. In fact, Japans expertise and success frees up resources for America to specialize in other areas. Both countries are then be
13、tter off. 3. How did Japanese get wealthier than Americans between 1960 and the beginning of the 1990s? Was it because they lost World War II and could start from scratch with all the newest technologies? A: (L15) Hardly. How could it ever be a good idea to let somebody destroy your factory? If new
14、technologies are superior to old, you can always junk your old factory and adopt the new technology.4. In Dave s opinion, what was the secret of Japanese success between 1960 and the beginning of the 1990s? A: There was no secret. The road to wealth for a nation is quite simple. Use your resources w
15、isely. Evidence: (L20-23) Some said it was the unique partnership between Japanese industry and its government. Japan had a government agency called MITI - the Ministry of International Trade and Industry - that many people credited with creating the Japanese miracle. 5.What does the example of “Hon
16、da and Sony” tell us? A: (L25-28) MITI did back some winners with government funding and assistance. They also picked some losers. They tried to discourage Honda from going into automobile and hampered Sonys activities in electronics. Honda and Sony were eventually great successes.(L28-30) I believe
17、 that MITIs role was not critical to Japans success. Japan also had great economic success in times when MITI did not exist or was insignificant. 6. What does “resource” refer to ? How can we use resources in a wise way? A: (L36) Not fertile land, but the know-how, education, ingenuity, and drive of
18、 the people. (L38)Using your resources wisely means giving the people the incentive to work hard, to innovate, and to take risks. How can we use resources in a wise way? 7. What does the author try to tell us by giving the example of “corn”? A: The roundabout way to wealth, opportunity Cost of a cho
19、ice and comparative advantage Evidence: (L51) It looks like growing your own corn is incredibly cheap. ou just have the cost of a little seed. But growing your own corn is in fact incredibly expensive because of the time it takes to weed, water, and fertilize. That time appears to be free, but it is
20、 costly. You have lost the opportunity to work at some other activity, earning money , and using that money to buy corn. Or having the time for leisure. If you think of your household as a nation, you import corn. You produce it in the roundabout way just like America produces televisions. 8. Accord
21、ing to Dave, under what circumstances will farmers plant corns by themselves? A: (L 61) It depends on whether it takes fewer minutes to grow an ear directly, or to earn enough money to buy corn by working at some other job using the roundabout way. 9. What would be the results of Americas import of
22、Japanese television? A: TS: (L 68) The television jobs are gone. Supporting evidence: a. Americans would be freed to gain more valuable opportunities. (L 66) You have lost the job of growing corn and gained a more valuable opportunity. b.More American youngsters would focus their attention on jobs i
23、n more profitable industries. (L 82) But the biggest change caused by that technology was invisible. The dreams of farmers children changed. (L85) Even though their parents and grandparents had been farmers, . farming was going to be less profitable than it had been. They made plans to become salesm
展开阅读全文