BulimiaNervosaDSM-IVCriteria-Associationfor:暴食症nervosadsmIV标准协会课件.ppt
- 【下载声明】
1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
3. 本页资料《BulimiaNervosaDSM-IVCriteria-Associationfor:暴食症nervosadsmIV标准协会课件.ppt》由用户(晟晟文业)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- BulimiaNervosaDSM IVCriteria Associationfor 暴食症 nervosadsmIV 标准 协会 课件
- 资源描述:
-
1、Improving CBT:Problems and Prospects G.Terence Wilson,Ph.D.Evidence-Based PracticeObstacles to Evidence-Based Treatment Two classes of obstacles:misconceptions about“evidence”and the applicability of research findings to clinical practice gaps in our current knowledge about treatments,mechanisms of
2、change,and reliable means of training competent practitioners (Shafran et al.,BRAT 2009)Problems with Clinical Judgement“Although this desire to tailor treatments to individual needs has face validity,it may be misguided.Reliance on clinical judgment is at odds with a body of research on clinical ve
3、rsus actuarial prediction indicating that,on the whole,actuarial methods are superior”(von Ranson&Robinson,2006)Problems with Clinical Judgement“In predicting behavior,highly trained clinical experts who assess all available information,and integrate it based on their own understanding of the detail
4、s of the individual case,do no better and usually worse than actuarial prediction”(Dawes,Faust,&Meehl,1989)Problems with Clinical Judgement Therapists may choose components of evidence-based treatment protocols based on“clinical experience,”subjective preference or ease of administration,hence omitt
5、ing or diluting what may be the most effective therapeutic elements(von Ranson&Robinson,2006;Waller,2009)Given free reign,even behavior therapists do not always use exposure in treating anxiety/phobic disorders(Becker et al.,2004;Schulte et al.,1995)Limitations of Clinical Judgement It is precisely
6、these limitations in decision making and case formulation,so well documented,that necessitate treatment guidelines(Dawes,1994;Wilson,1996)What Type of Clinical Judgement?Addressing patient non-response to treatment,and possibly revising the treatment formulation,requires clinical judgment Not subjec
7、tive clinical judgment based primarily on the therapists experience,but evidence-based judgment within the overall framework of CBT and in accordance with guidelines that are part of the treatment protocol e.g.,“taking stock”early(and possibly revamping the treatment plan)is a required feature of CB
8、T-E for eating disorders(Fairburn,2008)Competent manual-based therapy“.Two core skills are required:first,ensuring that patients remain engaged in the treatment and maintaining their motivation to change;and second,implementing and individualising the treatments strategies and procedures.Neither is
9、straightforward“(Fairburn,2010)Best Available Evidence?A scientifically-based approach to treatment must differentiate between types of evidence,and assign primary value to empirical research(i.e.,RCTs)APA scheme does not assign priority value to empirical research in clinical decision makingNICE Gu
10、idelines“.where sufficient evidence exists to allow general recommendation,the best practice must be to implement the treatment that enjoys the most empirical support rather than invoke subjective judgment”(Wilson&Shafran,2005-Lancet)Which Evidence-based Treatment?Selection criteria should include(a
11、mong others):Enduring effects Robust effects broadly applicable,generalized effects Brevity rapid response Cost-effectivenessTherapies or Therapists?It has been claimed that the evidence does not demonstrate the superiority of specific interventions,and that therapist effects may be more important t
12、han the therapyCBT treatment administered by competent therapists Typically few therapist effects in well-conducted RCTs showing superiority of one treatment over another Unsurprisingly,studies of weaker treatments without manuals have shown therapist effects(Crits-Christoph&Mintz,1991)Therapeutic r
13、elationship does not mediate outcomeEmpirically-supported treatments administered by competent therapists Therapists obtain better results as they become more competent in cognitive therapy(DeRubeis et al.,2005)Less experienced therapists using evidence-based treatment more effective than“expert”the
14、rapists using their preferred(non-CBT/DBT)approach(Linehan et al.,2006)Towards Developing More Effective TherapyTreatment Research PrioritiesIn evidence-based treatments,identify:1.Non-specific predictors of outcome(who is“treatment-resistant”?)2.Moderators of treatment effects(what works for whom u
15、nder what conditions?)3.Necessary and sufficient procedural components of effectiveness4.Mechanisms of change5.Treatment integrity6.Dissemination and implementation The Treatment Outcome Research Question“What treatment,by whom,is most effective for this individual with that specific problem,under w
16、hich set of circumstances”Gordon Paul(1967)ModeratorsImportance of Moderators Practitioners understandably want to know if a specific treatment is the most effective for an individual patient in particular?“personalized medicine”(Insel,2009)Importance of ModeratorsYet this is an unanswerable questio
展开阅读全文
链接地址:https://www.163wenku.com/p-5217908.html