胰腺炎胃管课件.ppt
- 【下载声明】
1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
3. 本页资料《胰腺炎胃管课件.ppt》由用户(晟晟文业)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 胰腺炎 课件
- 资源描述:
-
1、Nasogastric or NasojejunalAbstractNasojejunal tube feeding is considered the current standard of care in patients with severe and critical acute pancreatitis.However,it is not known whether enteral nutrition is best delivered into the jejunum.This Commentary discusses recent clinical studies that ha
2、ve shown that tube feeding into the stomach is safe and well tolerated in the vast majority of patients with acute pancreatitis,thus overthrowing the notion of putting the pancreas at rest.Development of a new conceptual framework is warranted to further advance nutritional management of patients wi
3、th acute pancreatitis.backThe study by Chang and colleagues 1 adds an important perspective to the discussion regarding the pancreatic rest concept,which is perhaps the oldest dogma in the management of AP.The central tenet of this concept is that enteral nutrition delivered into any part of the upp
4、er gastrointestinal tract other than the jejunum stimulates pancreatic secretion and,consequently,exacerbates the severity of AP.backThe corollary is that non-stimulatory nutrition had been widely advocated,being total parenteral nutrition two to three decades ago and nasojejunal tube feeding in the
5、 past decade.That is why the majority of randomised controlled trials in the past studied non-stimulatory regimens as both intervention and comparator,that is,either parenteral nutrition versus nil peros,or parenteral nutrition versusjejunal tube feeding,or jejunal tube feeding versus nil peros 7,8.
6、Definitions of the four severity categoriesThe recent international multidisciplinary classification of AP has redefined the severe category of severity and introduced the new critical category of severity(Table 1),thus putting a high emphasis on the need to optimise manage ment of these most challe
7、nging patients.(Peri)pancreatic necrosis is:1.nonviable tissue located in the pancreas alone,2.or in the pancreas and peripancreatic tissues,3.or in peripancreatic tissues alone.It can be solid or semisolid(partially liquefied)and is without a radiologically defined wall.Sterile(peri)pancreatic necr
8、osis is the absence of proven infection in necrosis.Definitions of the four severity categoriesInfected(peri)pancreatic necrosis is defined when at least one of the following is present:1.gas bubbles within(peri)pancreatic necrosis on computed tomography;2.a positive culture of(peri)pancreatic necro
9、sis obtained by image guided fine-needle aspiration;3.a positive culture of(peri)pancreatic necrosis obtained during the first drainage and/or necrosectomy.Organ failure is defined for three organ systems(cardiovascular,renal,and respiratory)on the basis of the worst measurement over a 24-hour perio
10、d.In patients without pre-existing organ dysfunction,organ failure is defined as either a score of 2 or more in the assessed organ system using the SOFA(Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment)score or when the relevant threshold is breached,as shown:Cardiovascular,need for inotropic agent;Renal,cre
11、atinine 171 mol/L(2.0 mg/dl);Respiratory,PaO2/FiO2(partial pressure of oxygen/fractional inspired oxygen concentration)300 mmHg(40 kPa).Definitions of the four severity categoriesPersistent organ failure is the evidence of organ failure in the same organ system for 48 hours or more.Transient organ f
12、ailure is the evidence of organ failure in the same organ system for less than 48 hours.Definitions of the four severity categoriesThe systematic literature review has appraised the current best evidence regarding the use of nasogastric tube feeding(presumed to be stimulatory)in patients with AP.It
13、demonstrates that the evidence base is(still)relatively small but does show that enteral nutrition given via the nasogastric route is well tolerated in more than 90%of patients with AP 9-11.NewIn line with the previous systematic review 2,it shows no statistically significant difference between non-
14、stimulatory and stimulatory regimens in terms of morbidity and mortality.The new,and somewhat surprising,finding here is that both routes of enteral feeding appear to be equivalent in terms of delivery of target calories.NewThere are two possible explanations for the observed results.First,tube feed
15、ing into the stomach might have been non-stimulatory in patients with AP.Unfortunately,little is known about the secretory response of the pancreas during the acute phase of clinical AP,let alone the effect of feeding on it 12.But a study in healthy volunteers demonstrated that both oral and duodena
16、l tube feeding stimulate pancreatic enzyme secretion in comparison with placebo 13.Moreover,the degree of pancreatic stimulation is very similar between oral and duodenal tube feeding.Second,tube feeding into the stomach might have stimulated the pancreas in patients with AP but it has no clinical r
展开阅读全文