书签 分享 收藏 举报 版权申诉 / 15
上传文档赚钱

类型《研究生学术英语读译教程》课件Unit 12 The Perils of Sharenting.pptx

  • 上传人(卖家):momomo
  • 文档编号:4832113
  • 上传时间:2023-01-16
  • 格式:PPTX
  • 页数:15
  • 大小:2.04MB
  • 【下载声明】
    1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
    2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
    3. 本页资料《《研究生学术英语读译教程》课件Unit 12 The Perils of Sharenting.pptx》由用户(momomo)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
    4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
    5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
    配套讲稿:

    如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。

    特殊限制:

    部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。

    关 键  词:
    研究生学术英语读译教程 研究生学术英语读译教程课件Unit 12 The Perils of Sharenting 研究生 学术 英语 教程 课件 Unit
    资源描述:

    1、Prediction Read the title and decide the tone of the text.A.positiveB.criticalC.objectiveD.pessimistic What is“sharenting”?A mix of sharing and parenting,sharenting(or oversharenting)is a feature of modern parenting,as increasing numbers of parents share photos and videos of their children on social

    2、 media.Skimming the Text Try finish Exercise I in 10 minutes.While skimming the context,DONT read the content,BUT pay attention to 3 types of clues:Pronouns(指代词)Keywords(关键词)Transitions(关联词)Clues within the missing sentencesA.“Applications such as Snapchat,which circumvent the permanence of most dig

    3、ital communications,are very popular among adolescents and teens,since they allow users to share intimate moments without the drama or long-term consequences of persistent messaging applications.”B.Some parents publish real-time information about their childrens whereabouts,potentially risking their

    4、 safety.And well-meaning adults readily go online to share photos of their kids in a variety of intimate settings.C.Given the searchable,shareable,long-lasting nature of whats published on the web,this dual role of parent and publisher raises a host of questions about privacy,consent,and the parent-

    5、child relationship more broadly.D.Regardless of where you stand on the issue,the episode helps illustrate one of the perils of sharenting:There are three children in the photo,none of whom can opt out of the digital footprint their family has now established for them.Is that fair to the kids?E.These

    6、 children might have legal arguments that could offer them privacy protections from their parents online disclosures,but it is also possible that a public health model will offer them even better protections while respecting family autonomy.Similar to the online decisions children will one day make

    7、on their own accord,the digital information has the potential to follow them throughout life.F.“With private groups,there is this false sense that everybody in the group knows each other and has the same interests in mind,”Steinberg told me.G.Developing this line of thinking from an early age prepar

    8、es children to manage their own behaviors online as they growand its a more nuanced way of thinking about online publishing than teaching kids to never share anything whatsoever.Reading and Identifying Main Idea Group work.Read paras.1-12 and list the Donts for parents that are mentioned in the text

    9、.Donts for Parents Dont mention a childs name or birth date.Dont post pictures of children in any state of undress.Dont trust privacy settings.Dont post pictures or information about children without consulting them.Reading and Identifying Main Idea Group work.Read paras.13-15 and pay special attent

    10、ion to how the other side of the“coin”is presented by the author.Reflecting on Key PointsRead the text again and consider the following question.With Facebook and Twitter(or Weiblog and WeChat in China),perhaps the two strongest social media drivers leading what is now being referred to as a“post-pr

    11、ivacy world,”one cant help but acknowledge the impact that social sharing has had on younger generations of parents whove become so accustomed to freely distributing intimate details of their lives.Do you agree that it is natural for them to share the information on behalf of their children too?Why

    12、or why not?To sharent or not to sharent?To sharent or not to sharent?Youve been answering the question-and its caused a bit of a stir.What follows are the range of views on Facebook which fall broadly into three categories.The proud parents The privacy protectorsThe irked at over-sharingGroup Discus

    13、sion In your opinion,who should decide what to share online?Why?What are the common rules that young parents should possibly follow?Work with your group mates and draft a list of“golden rules”for sharenting.Translation Revision:Exercise V.孩子正确的说“不,它不是好的为你发布”关于图片和引用,以及他们的成就和挑战的描述。经常发贴的父母可以和孩子谈论互联网,应该问孩子是否想让朋友和家人了解被共享的素材。采用“孩子为中心的视角”是必要的,但因为没有法律政策提供给青年人一种方法来解决晒娃导致的冲突,由下一代的父母改革数字的习惯,以确保他们的孩子可以行使他们的隐私权利,自由地定义他们的个性,进化他们的数字足迹的条款。

    展开阅读全文
    提示  163文库所有资源均是用户自行上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作他用。
    关于本文
    本文标题:《研究生学术英语读译教程》课件Unit 12 The Perils of Sharenting.pptx
    链接地址:https://www.163wenku.com/p-4832113.html

    Copyright@ 2017-2037 Www.163WenKu.Com  网站版权所有  |  资源地图   
    IPC备案号:蜀ICP备2021032737号  | 川公网安备 51099002000191号


    侵权投诉QQ:3464097650  资料上传QQ:3464097650
       


    【声明】本站为“文档C2C交易模式”,即用户上传的文档直接卖给(下载)用户,本站只是网络空间服务平台,本站所有原创文档下载所得归上传人所有,如您发现上传作品侵犯了您的版权,请立刻联系我们并提供证据,我们将在3个工作日内予以改正。

    163文库