Uniform-Prudent-Management-of-Institutional-Funds-Act-(UPMIFA)机构资金统一谨慎管理法(upmifa)-PPT精课件.ppt
- 【下载声明】
1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
3. 本页资料《Uniform-Prudent-Management-of-Institutional-Funds-Act-(UPMIFA)机构资金统一谨慎管理法(upmifa)-PPT精课件.ppt》由用户(三亚风情)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act UPMIFA 机构 资金 统一 谨慎 管理 PPT 课件
- 资源描述:
-
1、Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act(UPMIFA)Presented by CSU and KPMG LLPJanuary 2009 2008 KPMG LLP,the U.S.member firm of KPMG International,a Swiss cooperative.All rights reserved.Printed in U.S.A.KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International.2TopicslBackg
2、roundlUMIFA vs.UPMIFA lFAS 117-1 Endowment of Not-for-Profit OrganizationslNet Asset Classification for Funds Subject to UPMIFAlEnhanced Disclosures for All Endowment FundslImpact of AdoptionlEffective Date and TransitionlSenate Bill No.1329 lEnactment of UPMIFA in CaliforniaJanuary 2009 2008 KPMG L
3、LP,the U.S.member firm of KPMG International,a Swiss cooperative.All rights reserved.Printed in U.S.A.KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International.3BackgroundlIn July 2019,the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws approved the Uniform Prudent Management
4、 of Institutional Funds Act(UPMIFA).lUPMIFA is designed to replace the existing Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act(UMIFA).January 2009 2008 KPMG LLP,the U.S.member firm of KPMG International,a Swiss cooperative.All rights reserved.Printed in U.S.A.KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered tra
5、demarks of KPMG International.4 UMIFA vs.UPMIFATwo principles:lAssets would be invested prudently in diversified investments that sought growth as well as income1.Appreciation of assets could prudently be spent for purposes of any endowment fund held by a charitable institutionIncorporates the exper
6、ience gained in the last 35 years under UMIFA and provides for even stronger guidance for investment management and enumerating a more exact set of rules for investing in a prudent manner.Allowed endowments to:lInvest in any kind of assetslPool endowment funds for investment purposeslDelegate invest
7、ment management to others(e.g.,professional investment advisors).Requires:lInvestment“in good faith and with the care an ordinary prudent person in like position would exercise under similar circumstances.”lPrudence in incurring investment costs,authorizing“only costs that are appropriate and reason
8、able.”lFactors to be considered in investing include:lEffects of inflationlInvestment decisions must be made in relation to overall resources of the institution and its charitable purposes.lNo investment decision may be made in isolation,but in light of the funds entire portfolio.lInvestment should
9、be part of a strategy“having risk and return objectives reasonably suited to the fund and the institution.”lDiversify assets as an affirmative obligation unless“special circumstances”dictate otherwise.lInvestment experts,whether in-house or hired,are held to a standard of care consistent with that e
10、xpertise.January 2009 2008 KPMG LLP,the U.S.member firm of KPMG International,a Swiss cooperative.All rights reserved.Printed in U.S.A.KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International.5 UMIFA vs.UPMIFA(cont)lInitiated the concept of total return expenditure of endowment assets
11、for charitable program purposes.lPermitted prudent expenditure of both appreciation and income replacing the old trust law concept that only income(e.g.,interest and dividends)could be spent.lAsset growth and income could be appropriated for program purposes,subject to the rule that a fund could not
12、 be spent below“historic dollar value”.lBuilds upon UMIFAs rule on appreciationlEliminates the concept of“historic dollar value”lProvides better guidance on prudence lMakes the need for a floor on spending unnecessarylSeven criteria to guide yearly expenditure decisions:*lDuration and preservation o
13、f the endowment fundlPurposes of the institution and the endowment fundlGeneral economic conditionslEffect of inflation or deflationlExpected total return from income and the appreciation of investmentslOther resources of the institutionlInvestment policy of the institutionlOptional provision that a
14、llows states to enact another kind of safeguard against excess expenditure.If a state does not want to rely solely upon the rule of prudence provided in UPMIFA,the state may adopt a provision that creates a rebuttable presumption of imprudence if an institution expends an amount greater than 7 perce
15、nt of fair market value of a fund,calculated in an averaging formula over three years.Per SB 1329,Section 18504,(d)(2),the CSU is exempt from the 7 percent rebuttable presumption of imprudence.*These standards mirror the standards that apply to investment decision-making,thereby unifying both invest
16、ments and expenditure decisions more concretely.January 2009 2008 KPMG LLP,the U.S.member firm of KPMG International,a Swiss cooperative.All rights reserved.Printed in U.S.A.KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International.6 UMIFA vs.UPMIFA(cont)l The only option with respect t
17、o a restriction,was“release”of the restriction.lAuthorizes a modification that a court determines to be in accordance with the donors probable intention.If the charity asks for court approval of a modification,it must notify the states chief charitable regulator.lAllows a charity to modify a restric
18、tion on a small(20 years old)fund without going to court.SB 1329 allows up to$100,000.lIf a restriction becomes impracticable or wasteful,the charity may notify state charitable regulator,wait 60 days,and then modify the restriction consistent with the charitable purposes expressed in the original g
19、ift.January 2009 2008 KPMG LLP,the U.S.member firm of KPMG International,a Swiss cooperative.All rights reserved.Printed in U.S.A.KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International.7FAS 117-1lOn August 6,2019,FASB issued FASB Staff Position(FSP)FAS 117-1,Endowments of Not-for-Pro
20、fit Organizations:Net Asset Classification of Funds Subject to an Enacted Version of the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act,and Enhanced Disclosures for All Endowment FundslGuidance on net asset classification of donor-restricted endowment funds for not-for profit organization tha
21、t is subject to UPMIFA.lImproves disclosures about an organizations endowment funds(both donor-restricted endowment funds and board-designated endowment funds),whether or not the organization is subject to UPMIFA.January 2009 2008 KPMG LLP,the U.S.member firm of KPMG International,a Swiss cooperativ
22、e.All rights reserved.Printed in U.S.A.KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International.8Net Asset Classification for Funds Subject to UPMIFAlClassify a portion of a donor-restricted endowment fund of perpetual duration as permanently restricted net assets.lThe portion of a don
23、or-restricted endowment fund that is classified as permanently restricted net assets is not reduced by losses on the investments of the fund,except to the extent required by the donor.Likewise,the amount of permanently restricted net assets is not reduced by an organizations appropriations from the
24、fund.lClassify the portion of the fund that is not classified as permanently restricted net assets as temporarily restricted net assets(time restricted)until“appropriated for expenditure”.lAppropriation for expenditure:lOccurs upon approval for expenditure(e.g.,annual budget,or during the year as un
展开阅读全文
链接地址:https://www.163wenku.com/p-3604954.html