How-to-Conduct-Decent-Research-Work-论文写作讲座课件.ppt
- 【下载声明】
1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
3. 本页资料《How-to-Conduct-Decent-Research-Work-论文写作讲座课件.ppt》由用户(三亚风情)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- How to Conduct Decent Research Work 论文 写作 讲座 课件
- 资源描述:
-
1、1How to Conduct Decent Research WorkFeng Zheng, Ph.D.Materials ChemistryCentral South University2Aims Provide a simple but formal introduction to young researchers the basic strategy employed by peer-reviewed scientists around the world Personal experience home and abroad Suggestions for future work
2、 Editorial work Itches of translation/interpretation3Identify a Project Literature search (up to now) Introduction (why, what, how, what) Why is/are this/these important What has/have been done How did they do What was/were left (for you) and What do you want to do Theoretical work? Experimental wor
3、k?4Title Proper words for your title 好的开头是成功的一半好的开头是成功的一半 A good beginning is half done. Be caution when using on, investigation, research and study for title5Theory & Experiment Set-up What do you want to do Improve or against existing theory? Provide more data? Propose novel ideas? How to achieve
4、your goals Better or reliable theoretical analysis Better or new experimental results Raw materials Equipments Experiment procedure6Results New theoretical analysis (not ease) For most engineering work we need: Chemical composition Structure Mechanical properties Physical properties Etc. In proper o
5、rder7Analysis or Discussion How to describe your results How to make comparison with literature Why are your work important What are your contribution to science or engineering What are your conclusions8Conclusions What are your conclusions Theoretical analysis Experimental results Work ongoing or s
6、uggestions9Abstract What has/have been done Most important results Tune of past was/were, has/have been 10Acknowledgements Financial support Help for discussion and theoretical analysis Help of technicians11Literature Citation History of this work Make yours part of the history Later work has to cit
7、e your paper (important) Style according to instruction for authors of chosen journal12Check list Title (eye-catching) Authors (team work*) Abstract (concise) Introduction (story-telling) Experimental procedure (book-keeping) Results (book-keeping) Discussion (elegance, cross-reference) Conclusion (
8、solid) Acknowledgements (polite) Literature citation (honest)13Text Layout Keep it consistent throughout the manuscript. Double line spacing and 12 font is preferred: make it convenient for reviewers to make annotations. Number the pages. Number the lines if the journal requires to do so.14Length of
9、 Full Article“25- 30 pages is the ideal length for a submitted manuscript, including essential data only.” Julian Eastoe, Co-editor, Journal of Colloid and Interface ScienceTitle pageAbstract 1 paragraphIntroduction 1.5-2 manuscript pages (double-spaced, 12pt)Methods 2-4 manuscript pagesResults and
10、Discussion 10-12 manuscript pagesConclusions 1-2 manuscript pagesFigures 6-8Tables 1-3References 20-50 itemsLetters or short communications have a stricter limitation of the length. For example, 3000 words with no more than 5 illustrations.15Submission Where to publish your work Impact factor Scient
11、ific Community (bulletin, transactions and journals of well-established international or national society) Electrical submission Cover letter Corresponding author16Communication to Editors Acknowledge editorial work Address exactly the questions raised by reviewers Rebuttal with sound evidences17Wha
12、t Gets You Accepted? Attention to details Check and double check your work Consider the reviews English must be as good as possible Presentation is important Take your time with revision Acknowledge those who have helped you New, original and previously unpublished Critically evaluate your own manus
13、cript Ethical rules must be obeyed Nigel John Cook, Editor-in-Chief, Ore Geology Reviews18Suggestions for Students Lab records (experiment results) Literature reviewing (introduction & discussion) Talk to supervisor (bring copied articles & data) Discussion with other faculty/fellow students Write d
展开阅读全文