Unit 1 reading &extended reading 原文译文-(2020)新牛津译林版高中英语选择性必修第二册.docx
- 【下载声明】
1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
3. 本页资料《Unit 1 reading &extended reading 原文译文-(2020)新牛津译林版高中英语选择性必修第二册.docx》由用户(大布丁)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Unit reading &extended 原文译文-2020新牛津译林版高中英语选择性必修第二册 extended 原文 译文 2020 牛津 译林版 高中英语 选择性 必修 第二 下载 _选择性必修第二册_牛津译林版(2020)_英语_高中
- 资源描述:
-
1、Be A Critical News Reader! 做一个有判断力的阅读者 Firefighters put out tower block fire 消防员扑灭高楼大火 Firefighters quickly put out the Henderson Tower fire last night. The fire, which is thought to have started from the 8th floor, spread quickly through the tower block on Sunday night, leaving people on the upper
2、floors trapped. Fears grew that the number of deaths could reach 5, according to figures released by emergency services. Fire engines and ambulances, called at 9:30 p.m., reached the scene within 15 minutes. By this time, the fire had extended to the 15th floor. Firefighters got the situation under
3、control around 11 p.m. There is concern that the construction company that built the tower block had not followed fire safety rules. 昨晚消防员迅速扑灭了亨德森大楼的大火。周日晚上的这场火灾被认为起于8楼,并迅速蔓延至整栋大 楼,导致九楼以上的人被困。根据应急服务机构公布的数据,人们更加担心死亡人数可能达到 5 人。昨 晚 9 点 30 分,消防车和救护车接到呼叫,并于 15 分钟内赶到火灾现场。此时火势已蔓延至十五楼。晚 上 11 点左右,消防员控制住了火势。有
4、人担心建造这栋高楼的建筑公司没有遵守消防安全规范。 Deadly fire in tower block causes serious damage 高楼致命大火造成严重损失 A terrible fire broke out on Sunday night, leaving the Henderson Tower seriously damaged. Emergency services estimate that the number of deaths could reach 9. By this morning, 4 people have been confirmed dead. T
5、he fire has also left dozens of people injured, 5 of whom are in a critical condition. Lisa Mayer, 29, is among the lucky ones who only suffered minor injuries. She recalled, I was about to have a bath when I heard people screaming and dogs barking. I looked outside and the smoke was choking me. It
6、was like an awful dream. 周日晚间突发一场可怕的大火,致使亨德森大楼严重受损。应急服务机构估计死亡人数可能达到 9 人。 截至今天上午,已有 4 人确认死亡。大火还造成许多人受伤,其中 5 人伤势严峻。29 岁的莉萨迈耶是只 受了轻伤的幸运人士之一。她回忆说:“我正要洗澡,就听到有人尖叫,还有狗在叫。我向外看,却被浓 烟呛住。这就像一场可怕的梦。” Mr Peterson, head of the fire service, confirms that a dropped cigarette end on a carpet of the 8th floor starte
7、d the fire and that the automatic fire alarms did not go off quickly enough to prevent the disaster. A team is currently investigating the accident further. 消防队队长彼得森先生证实,一根掉在九楼一块地毯上的烟头引起了火灾,而自动火警报警器没有及时 报警,因而导致了灾难的发生。调查组目前正在进一步调查这起事故。 Reading news reports critically 批判性地阅读新闻报道 We rely on news to lea
8、rn about what is happening in the world around us. However, we usually find that reports on the same events contain different or even contradictory information. How do these differences come about?我们依赖新闻来了解周围的世界正在发生什么事情。然而,我们经常发现,对同一事件的不同报道 往往包含不同甚至互相矛盾的信息。这些差异是如何产生的? It is advisable to remember tha
9、t journalists may have different priorities, which would influence how they report an event. Lets take the two news reports on the Henderson Tower fire as an example. We can see that the first news report pays more attention to the rescue efforts, while the second talks more about deaths and injurie
10、s. When we read more than one report, we come to understand an event in a more comprehensive way. 明智的做法是记住记者眼中的首要事项可能会有所不同,这会影响他们如何报道一则事件。让我们以这 两篇有关亨德森大楼火灾的新闻报道为例。我们可以看到,第一篇新闻报道更关注救援工作,而第二篇 谈论更多的则是伤亡情况。当我们读到不止一篇报道时,我们就能更全面地了解一起事件。 Even if news reports are written from basically the same perspective,
11、 they may contradict each other in terms of factual details, as events in the real world are usually complicated and constantly changing. For instance, the numbers of deaths differ in the two news reports on the Henderson Tower fire. When we come across such factual differences, we should not rush t
12、o the conclusion that one of the news reports gives false information. Instead, check when the reports were written. News reports written at different stages of an event could contain different information as new facts are brought to light. Another aspect worthy of mention is that journalists may ap
13、proach information they get from research or interviews differently. Suppose emergency services estimates of the number of deaths vary between 5 and 9. Journalists may choose to present the minimum, the maximum or something in between in their news reports. Therefore, checking different sources enab
14、les us to draw a more informed conclusion. 即使新闻报道的撰写角度基本相同,它们也可能在事实性的细节上相互矛盾,因为现实世界中的事 件通常是复杂且不断变化的。例如,在两篇有关亨德森大楼火灾的新闻报道中,死亡人数截然不同。当 我们发现这些事实性差异时,不应急于下结论,认为其中一篇新闻报道提供了错误信息。相反,要核查 这些报道的撰写时间。随着新的事实被披露,在一起事件的不同阶段撰写的新闻报道可能包含不同的信 息。另一个值得一提的方面是,记者可能会以不同的方式处理他们从调查或采访中获得的信息。假设应 急服务机构估计的死亡人数在 5 人到 9 人之间,记者可能
15、会选择在他们的新闻报道中呈现数据的最小值、 最大值或中间的某个数值。因此,核实信息的不同来源能够让我们得出更有根据的结论。 To sum up, it is wise to read news reports written from various perspectives and at different stages, which brings us a more accurate understanding of a situation. We also need to be critical about the information we receive and remember
16、not to blindly trust what we have read. Though journalists are committed to presenting the truth, it is better to use our own judgement than rely entirely on news reports. With great discrimination, every one of us has the potential to be a critical news reader. 总之,阅读从不同角度、不同阶段写就的新闻报道是明智之举,这样可以让我们更准
展开阅读全文
链接地址:https://www.163wenku.com/p-2379412.html