专业英语(研究生)全册配套完整课件3.ppt
- 【下载声明】
1. 本站全部试题类文档,若标题没写含答案,则无答案;标题注明含答案的文档,主观题也可能无答案。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
2. 本站全部PPT文档均不含视频和音频,PPT中出现的音频或视频标识(或文字)仅表示流程,实际无音频或视频文件。请谨慎下单,一旦售出,不予退换。
3. 本页资料《专业英语(研究生)全册配套完整课件3.ppt》由用户(罗嗣辉)主动上传,其收益全归该用户。163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对该用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!
4. 请根据预览情况,自愿下载本文。本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
5. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007及以上版本和PDF阅读器,压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 专业 英语 研究生 配套 完整 课件
- 资源描述:
-
1、专业英语(研究生)全册配套专业英语(研究生)全册配套完整课件完整课件3Advanced English WritingSpring Semester, 2017Spring Semester, 2017Graduate Program, School of Environment, Jinan UniversityGraduate Program, School of Environment, Jinan UniversityChapter 1.Objectives of Scientific Writing and Overview of Grammatical Issues Chapter
2、 2.Structure of a ManuscriptChapter 3.Title, Abstract and ConclusionChapter 4.The importance of INTRODUCTIONChapter 5.Experimental SectionChapter 6.Results and DiscussionChapter 7.Acknowledgments, Citations and ReferencesChapter 8.Tables and FiguresChapter 9.Supplemental SectionChapter 10.Ethics in
3、Scientific PublishingChapter 11.Preparation for Manuscript SubmissionChapter 12.Response to Review Comments, Manuscript Revision and Approval of Galley ProofOutline1. Everyone registered for the class must ask at least one question in writing before each class. This will be part of the overall cours
4、e score.Course Requirements2. The final exam will be conducted in a closed session.1. Misuse of the tenses.What is not Covered2. Misuse of the singular and plural.3. Misuse of the preposition, adverb and participle.4. Incomplete sentences (the subject, object or predicate is missing).5. Confused, il
5、logical or misleading expressions.Advanced English WritingAdvanced English WritingChapter 1.Objectives of Scientific Writing and Overview of Grammatical Issues Everyone taking this course, upon spending reasonable efforts, will develop the ability to prepare nicely structured and formatted manuscrip
6、ts with clear logical and scientific rationales and as few common grammatical errors as possible. Overall Goal1. How do we present our research results?2. Why do we want to publish in international journals? Two Pressing Questions1. How do we present our research results? Basic Research: Papers, tec
7、hnical reports, etc. Applied Research: Patents, software, standards, etc. Applications: Completion of projects, financial gains, etc.2.Why do we want to publish in international journals? Wide exposure and recognition. Rigorous review process, which is helpful for improving the quality of submission
8、s. Great personal gains due to the current performance evaluation criteria.Three Misperceptions on English Writing1. Taking class can substantially improve writing skills.2. Residing in an English-speaking nation can write good English papers.3. Writing has little to do with oral and listening abili
9、ty.Three “No”s in English Writing1.There is no short-cut; only practice, practice and practice.2.There is no creation; only imitation, imitation and imitation.3.There is no genius; only endeavor, endeavor and endeavor.Practice makes perfect!Reviewer 1:.I think the present manuscript was well-written
10、 and the objective of this study was very clear. In addition, the data on PBDEs in seafood are scarce worldwide, which will be contributed to the documentation of PBDEs in foodstuff in China. Therefore, the present manuscript looks suitable for publication to Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,
11、but some parts should be modified or added to clarify something. Specific comments are as below;.Reviewer 2:There are language errors.In my opinion the manuscript is very poorly written. Even though the authors analyzed large number of samples, the analytical results obtained are neither well presen
12、ted nor discussed. I suggest the authors to rewrite the entire manuscript, correct all the mistakes pointed out, add more information from other relevant publications available worldwide and get the manuscript corrected by a native English speaker. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (2010)Review
13、er 1:.Generally, the experimental and data evaluation approaches are sound and the paper is well written. I recommend that the manuscript could be published after revisions. Reviewer 2:.The manuscript is well organized and well written. I have mentioned some issues to be addressed below. Once these
14、points have been satisfactorily addressed, the paper should be granted publication. Environmental Science & Technology (2009)Reviewer 3:.The paper needs serious editing, and additional discussion as out lined below.Reviewer 2:. The data analysis is thorough, and the manuscript was carefully prepared
15、. Overall, the quality of this work meets the publication in ES&T with the corrections and improvements suggested below. Environmental Science & Technology (2014)Reviewer 3:This manuscript provides results of a sediment survey that contrasts PBDE flame retardant concentrations with those of alternat
16、ive halogenated FRs. The paper is fairly well written, provides data that is of interest to the research community, and the quality of the data is sufficient for publication. .Reviewer 1:.Overall the present manuscript was well-written and experimental procedures are acceptable due to strict QA/QC p
17、rotocols. The obtained results were compared to the depositional fluxes of PBDEs measured worldwide. . Environmental Science & Technology (2014)Reviewer 3:. The paper deals with a complex dataset in a comprehensible manner. The methods appear to be sound (although see point 1 below) and the work car
18、efully conducted. The subject matter appears to be suitable in my opinion for Environmental Science and Technology; while the methods are not novel the results contribute to an understanding of the depositional fluxes and atmospheric washout of these compounds in diverse geographic areas.Reviewer 1:
19、.In general it is well written. I provide some suggestions below (mostly grammatical/for clarity). Reviewer 2:. Also the paper was well written. I suggest that the paper to be published in ES&T with minor revision, as suggested below.Environmental Science & Technology (2014)Reviewer 3:. The study is
20、 well-written and a useful contribution to our understanding of the relationship between particle-size and deposition. A few changes are needed to improve the clarity of the manuscript.Reviewer 1:. This is a well written review of the potential for dermal exposure and contact to chemical contaminant
21、s generated from e-waste. It provides a clear summary of the relevant literature and builds a strong hypothesis that this route of exposure may be significant and in need of further research. . Environmental Science & Technology (2016) Long sentences (Period “.” is used more often in English than in
22、 Chinese)Common Grammatical IssuesOriginal (one sentence):The Pearl River Delta, a sub-tropical area with mild ambient temperatures (annual mean temperature of 1423 oC) and frequent rainfalls (annual mean precipitation of 12002200 mm) all year around, located in South China, is a major manufacturing
23、 base for products such as electrical and electronic products, plastic products, vehicles, garments and textiles, etc., which are most associated with consumption of PBDEs, has become one of the most economically developed and industrialized zones in China (From Wikipedia, 2009). Revised (two senten
24、ces):In the Pearl River Delta (PRD), an area of 53,580 km2 (8) within Guangdong Province in southern China (Figure S1 of the Supporting Information; “S” designates tables, figures and other contents in the Supporting Information thereafter), the annual mean air temperature is 1923 oC and the annual
25、mean precipitation is 15002200 mm (9). Large quantities of PBDEs have been used in manufacture of electrical and electronic devices, plastic products, vehicles, garments, and textiles in the PRD (10). (ES&T 2009, 43, 9142-9147) Long sentences (Use of simple expressions)Common Grammatical IssuesOrigi
展开阅读全文