欢迎来到163文库! | 帮助中心 精品课件PPT、教案、教学设计、试题试卷、教学素材分享与下载!
163文库
全部分类
  • 办公、行业>
  • 幼教>
  • 小学>
  • 初中>
  • 高中>
  • 中职>
  • 大学>
  • 各类题库>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 163文库 > 资源分类 > PPT文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    《健康经济学》课件Chapter2.ppt

    • 文档编号:5900314       资源大小:1.45MB        全文页数:28页
    • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:15文币     交易提醒:下载本文档,15文币将自动转入上传用户(momomo)的账号。
    微信登录下载
    快捷注册下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要15文币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    优惠套餐(点此详情)
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、试题类文档,标题没说有答案的,则无答案。带答案试题资料的主观题可能无答案。PPT文档的音视频可能无法播放。请谨慎下单,否则不予退换。
    3、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者搜狗浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。。

    《健康经济学》课件Chapter2.ppt

    1、Standard economic demand curves are downward slopingAs price(P)decreases,quantity(Q)demanded increasesExample:P=$3,Q=4 lollipopsP=$1,Q=8 lollipopsP=$0.50,Q=9 lollipops Elasticity measures the degree of downward-sloping Elastic demand DE price sensitive:changes in price greatly affect the quantity de

    2、mandedInelastic demand DIPrice insensitive:changes in price do not significantly change the quantity demandedDoes the demand curve for health care slope downward?Are people sensitive to the price of health care?Is demand for vaccines such thatP=$100,Q=1,000P=$1,Q=1,000i.e.demand is inelastic?Is dema

    3、nd for band-aids such thatP=$100,Q=1P=$1,Q=30i.e.demand is elastic?If people always obey their doctors,then demand should be inelastic!Need randomized experiments Randomized experiments:Definition:a study that assigns treatments randomly to different groups of study participantsIncludes:A control gr

    4、oup(no treatment)Placebo groupHelps generate experimental groups that are statistically similar to each otherNon-randomized experiments can be biasedMeasured demand curve DM is biased compared to true demand DTPeople generally choose the amount of insurance they receiveSicker people will choose more

    5、 insurance because they know they will need more careEvidence from Randomized ExperimentsTwo Randomized ExperimentsRAND Health Insurance Experiment(HIE)Oregon Medicaid ExperimentRAND HIERandomly assigned 2,000 families from six US cities to different insurance coverage plansCopayments groups:Free,25

    6、%,50%,and 95%Tracked utilization of health care(Q)in each copayment plan(P)Copayment acts as the marginal cost that each family faces when buying careOregon Medicaid ExperimentCompared two groups of low-income adultsMedicaid lottery winners vs.lottery losersLottery winners got to apply for public he

    7、alth insurance through Medicaid So they faced lower out-of-pocket prices for careLottery losers could not get Medicaid(but might have purchased outside insurance)Results?Health care demand curves are downward sloping(economic theory prevails!)Price changes affected demand for health careDifferent me

    8、asures of careOutpatient CareDef:any medical care that does not involve an overnight hospital stayE.g.runny noses,twisted ankles,minor broken bonesInpatient CareDef:medical care requiring overnight staysE.g.More serious surgeries or conditions that require overnight recovery or monitoringER CareDef:

    9、care involving the emergency roomE.g.heart attacks,strokes Outpatient careRAND HIEAs patient cost-sharing(P)increases,number of episodes(Q)of outpatient care decreasesHolds for both acute and chronic conditionsData from Keeler et al.(1988)Outpatient careOregon Medicaid StudyLottery winners have more

    10、 outpatient visits than lottery losersBoth the RAND HIE and the Oregon Medicaid Study find downward-sloping demand for outpatient care!Inpatient careRAND HIE Oregon Medicaid StudyNo significant difference in usage rates between lottery winners and lottery losersDemand is still downward-sloping but l

    11、ess elastic than demand for outpatient care(Data from Keeler,1988)ER careRAND HIEOregon Medicaid StudyNo significant difference in ER care for lottery winners vs.lottery losersEven for emergency room care likely the most urgent kind those on the highest copayment plan in the RAND HIE were less likel

    12、y to buy care!(Data from Newhouse,1993)Pediatric carePediatric careDef:care for infants or children usually paid for by a parent or guardianData from RAND HIE:Mental health&dental Care(RAND HIE)Prescription drugsData from RAND HIENon-randomized experiment evidenceU.S.MedicareCitizens are eligible fo

    13、r health insurance through Medicare when they turn 65 but not beforeIf demand for health care is downward-sloping,we expect a jump in health care usage at age 65This is known as a discontinuity studyThere is a discontinuity in health insurance at age 65Card et al.(2009)Card et al.have two main findi

    14、ngs:Unplanned emergency department admissions follow a linear trend around the age of 65Other hospital admissions jump up at the age of 65There is a discontinuity in medical usage at the same point of discontinuity in Medicare coverage!This is further evidence that demand for health care is sensitiv

    15、e to priceComparing demand curves How can we determine which type of demand is more price sensitive?Data from Keeler et al.(1988)Arc Elasticity Need a measure to compare the relative price sensitivity of different goodsSo the measure needs to be unitless(how else would we compare ER visits to sticks

    16、 of gum?)Arc Elasticity:Health care has inelastic demandDoes price for care affect health?Mortality ratesRAND HIE:no difference between treatment groups*10%difference of mortality rate between high-risk participants on free and cost-sharing plans(people on free plan less likely to die)Oregon Medicai

    17、d:no difference between lottery winners and losersDoes the price of care affect health?Does price for care affect health?RAND HIE:Generally,no health differences between people on free plan vs.cost-sharing!*Only statistically significant difference between plans were in blood pressure,myopia,&presby

    18、opiaDoes price for care affect health?Oregon Medicaid ExperimentLottery winners self-reported better overall health,more healthy days,and lower rates of depressionDiscrepancy with RAND HIE may be because Oregon Medicaid Study worked with the very low-income,while RAND HIE studied a broader cross-sec

    19、tion of the U.S.ConclusionDemand curves for health care are downward slopingQuantity of care demanded is sensitive to price(though not as sensitive as other demands,e.g.for movies)BUT generally,price of health care does not seem to affect ones healthException is that price seems to affect the most vulnerable segments of the population(low-income,high blood pressure,etc.)Policy and health insurance implications?


    注意事项

    本文(《健康经济学》课件Chapter2.ppt)为本站会员(momomo)主动上传,其收益全归该用户,163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    Copyright@ 2017-2037 Www.163WenKu.Com  网站版权所有  |  资源地图   
    IPC备案号:蜀ICP备2021032737号  | 川公网安备 51099002000191号


    侵权投诉QQ:3464097650  资料上传QQ:3464097650
       


    【声明】本站为“文档C2C交易模式”,即用户上传的文档直接卖给(下载)用户,本站只是网络空间服务平台,本站所有原创文档下载所得归上传人所有,如您发现上传作品侵犯了您的版权,请立刻联系我们并提供证据,我们将在3个工作日内予以改正。

    163文库