欢迎来到163文库! | 帮助中心 精品课件PPT、教案、教学设计、试题试卷、教学素材分享与下载!
163文库
全部分类
  • 办公、行业>
  • 幼教>
  • 小学>
  • 初中>
  • 高中>
  • 中职>
  • 大学>
  • 各类题库>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 163文库 > 资源分类 > PPT文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    资源与环境经济学:Chapter 5.ppt

    • 文档编号:1678101       资源大小:778.50KB        全文页数:26页
    • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:9.5文币     交易提醒:下载本文档,9.5文币将自动转入上传用户(金钥匙文档)的账号。
    微信登录下载
    快捷注册下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要9.5文币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    优惠套餐(点此详情)
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、试题类文档,标题没说有答案的,则无答案。带答案试题资料的主观题可能无答案。PPT文档的音视频可能无法播放。请谨慎下单,否则不予退换。
    3、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者搜狗浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。。

    资源与环境经济学:Chapter 5.ppt

    1、Chapter 5 Sustainable Development: Defining The Concept 1. Introduction Main contents: Investigate one particular fairness concern- the treatment of future generations. Begin by considering a specific, ethically challenging situation-the allocation of a depletable resource over time. Defining what w

    2、e mean by a fair intertemporal allocation. Take this theoretical definition and consider how it can be made operationally measurable. 2. A Two-Period Model According to dynamic efficiency, the objective is to balance present and future uses of this resource by maximizing the present value(现值) of the

    3、 net benefits derived from the use of those resources. This implies a particular allocation of the resource across time. 2. A Two-Period Model Assume: We have a fixed supply of a depletable resource to allocate between two periods. Demand is constant in the two periods, the marginal willingness-to-p

    4、ay(边际支 付意愿) is given by the formula P=8- 0.4q, and marginal cost(边际成本) is constant at $2 per unit. 2. A Two-Period Model If the total supply were 30 or greater, whats the efficient allocation between two periods? If the available supply is less than 30, suppose it is equal to 20, how do we determine

    5、 the efficient allocation? Figure 5.1 2. A Two-Period Model How to find the allocation that maximizes present value? The dynamically efficient allocation of this resource has to satisfy the condition that the present value of the marginal net benefit (边际净收益现值)from the last unit in period 1 equals th

    6、e present value of the marginal net benefit in period 2. Figure 5.2 2. A Two-Period Model Any efficient allocation method must take scarcity(稀缺) into account. Intemporal scarcity imposes an opportunity cost (机会成本)that we henceforth refer to as the marginal user cost(边际使用者成本)(边际使用者成本). The marginal u

    7、ser cost is the present value of the forgone opportunities at the margin. Figure 5.3 2. A Two-Period Model An efficient market would have to consider not only the marginal cost of extraction(边际开采成本) for this resource, but the marginal user cost(边 际使用者成本) as well. In the absence of scarcity, P=MC Wit

    8、h the scarcity, P=MC+MUC 2. A Two-Period Model Both the size of the marginal user cost (边际 使用者成本)and the allocation of the resource between the two period is affecter by the discount rate(贴现率)(贴现率). The general conclusion is that higher discount rates tend to skew resource extraction toward the pres

    9、ent because they give the future less weight in balancing the relative value of present and future resource use. 3. Defining Intertemporal Fairness The sustainability criterion(可持续(可持续 标准)标准) suggests that, at a minimum, future generations should be left no worse off than current generations. 3. Def

    10、ining Intertemporal Fairness Do our institution provide adequate protection for future generations? Are all efficient allocations sustainable (可持续的)? 4. Are Efficient Allocation Fair? In the numerical example we have constructed, it certainly does not appear that particular efficient allocation sati

    11、sfies the sustainable criterion because more resources are allocated to the first period than to the second. 4. Are Efficient Allocation Fair? Although dynamic efficient allocations(动态 有效配置) do not automatically satisfy sustainability criteria(可持续标准), they can be perfectly consistent with sustainabi

    12、lity, even in an economy relying heavily on depletable resources because it will always be possible to set aside sufficient net benefits accrued in the first period for those in the second period, so that those in the second period will be at least as well off as they would have been with any other

    13、extraction profile. 5. Applying The Sustainability Criterion One of the difficulties in assessing the fairness of intertemporal(跨时期的) allocations using version of the sustainability criterion is that it is so difficult to apply. 5. Applying The Sustainability Criterion Is it possible to develop a ve

    14、rsion of the sustainability criterion that is more operational? Fortunately it is, thanks to what has become known as the “Hartwick Rule.” John Hartwick (1977) demonstrated that a constant level of consumption could be maintained perpetually if all the scarcity rent(稀缺租) were invested in capital. 5.

    15、 Applying The Sustainability Criterion Two important insights flow from Hartwicks reinterpretation of the sustainability criterion. First, with this version it is possible to judge the sustainability(可持续性) of an allocation by examining whether or not the value of the total capital stock(总资本储备) is no

    16、ndeclining. Second, this analysis suggests the specific degree of sharing that would be necessary to produce a sustainable outcome, namely all scarcity rent (稀缺租)must be invested. 5. Applying The Sustainability Criterion How do we apply Hartwick Rule to environment? In general, the Hartwick Rule sug

    17、gests that the current generation has been given an endowment(资源禀赋). Sustainable use of this endowment implies that we should keep the principal (the value of the endowment ) intact and live off only the flow of services provided. 5. Applying The Sustainability Criterion Weak sustainability(弱可持续性)(弱

    18、可持续性) means that resource use by previous generations should not exceed a level that would prevent subsequent generations from achieving a level of well-being at least as great. One of the implications of this definition is that the value of the capital stock (natural plus physical capital ) should

    19、not decline. 5. Applying The Sustainability Criterion Strong sustainability (强可持续性)(强可持续性) means that the value of the remaining stock of natural capital (自然资本)should not decrease. This definition places special emphasis on preserving natural capital under the assumption that natural and physical ca

    20、pital offer limited substitution possibilities. 5. Applying The Sustainability Criterion Environmental sustainability(环境的可(环境的可 持续性)持续性) means that the physical flows of individual resources should be maintained, not merely the value of the aggregate. 6. Implications For Environmental Policy In orde

    21、r to be useful guides to policy, our sustainability and efficiency criteria must be neither synonymous nor incompatible. Do these criteria meet that test? They do. Objectives & Requirements Grasp the two-period model Understand the meaning of marginal user cost Understand the impacts of discount rat

    22、e on resource allocation Understand the meaning of sustainability, weak sustainability, strong sustainability and environmental sustainability Understand the relationship between efficient allocation and fairness Discussion Compare two versions of the two-period depletable resource model which diffe

    23、r only in the treatment of marginal extraction cost. Assume that in the second version the constant marginal extraction cost is lower in the second period than the first. The constant marginal extraction cost is the same in both periods in the first version and is equal to the marginal extraction co

    24、st in the first period of the second version. In a dynamic efficient allocation how would the extraction profile in the second version differ from the first? Would relatively more or less be allocated to the second period in the second version than in the first version? Would the marginal user cost be higher or lower in the second version?


    注意事项

    本文(资源与环境经济学:Chapter 5.ppt)为本站会员(金钥匙文档)主动上传,其收益全归该用户,163文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上传内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知163文库(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!




    Copyright@ 2017-2037 Www.163WenKu.Com  网站版权所有  |  资源地图   
    IPC备案号:蜀ICP备2021032737号  | 川公网安备 51099002000191号


    侵权投诉QQ:3464097650  资料上传QQ:3464097650
       


    【声明】本站为“文档C2C交易模式”,即用户上传的文档直接卖给(下载)用户,本站只是网络空间服务平台,本站所有原创文档下载所得归上传人所有,如您发现上传作品侵犯了您的版权,请立刻联系我们并提供证据,我们将在3个工作日内予以改正。

    163文库